Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Standards for Filtered vs Total
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
emunro  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:31:28 PM(UTC)
emunro
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Posts: 11
Location: Vancouver

Hi,

I would like to see the standard for total distinct from dissolved. If there is only a standard for total then it should not show up in the dissolved. Currently, the default seems to be to have the standard listed for both even if it is only meant to be for total.

Is there any way to distinguish between a standard for filtered results vs for total results?

Thanks,

Elisa
Back to top

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your ESdat Forums forum accountor Register a new forum account.
Back to top  
Warwick Wood  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:31:19 PM(UTC)
Warwick Wood
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Posts: 498
Man
Location: Byron Bay

Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 19 post(s)

Hi Elisa,

In ESdat 5 if you look under Data Tables - zRef_Environmental_Standards one of the columns (to the right) is "Applies to total results" and another is "Applies to filtered results".  These values default to True, but you can set to False.

 

Regards,

Warwick 

 

 
Back to top
WWW
emunro  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:56:53 PM(UTC)
emunro
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Posts: 11
Location: Vancouver

Hi Warwick,

Thanks for the info. However, even after I have indicated "true/false" in the "applies to total/filtered results" field, it still shows up in both for my chemistry output tables. I've sent you the chemistry output table for your reference.

Is there a way to fix this?

Thanks,

Elisa

File Attachment(s):
Chemistry_Output_Table_Standards_ESDat Forum.xls (903kb) downloaded 1 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Warwick Wood  
#4 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:13:38 AM(UTC)
Warwick Wood
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Posts: 498
Man
Location: Byron Bay

Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 19 post(s)

Hi Elisa,

This must be a bug in the Access version, where it is always applied to filtered as well as total, irrespective of that setting.

We will issue a fix, but in the meantime, for Chem Tables at least if you paste a blank cell over those "filtered" values you don't want to see (pasting a blank cell will clear the cell and delete the comment markers) and reformat exceedances the exceedances will highlight as you need.

Warwick

 

 
Back to top
WWW
emunro  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:42:39 PM(UTC)
emunro
Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Posts: 11
Location: Vancouver

Hi Warwick,

Thanks for your response. We are going to be producing several chem output tables that will have this same issue for a time-sensitive project. Any chance you could provide a timeline on this fix?

Elisa

 
Back to top
Warwick Wood  
#6 Posted : Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:29:27 AM(UTC)
Warwick Wood
Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Posts: 498
Man
Location: Byron Bay

Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 19 post(s)

Hi Elisa,

A fix for this is up on the website.  It turns out that the guideline value was listed for both Total & Filtered versions of the ChemName, although flagging of exceedances did correctly check the Total/Filtered applicability.

Warwick 
Back to top
WWW
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET